Помогите пожалуйста написать сочинение на британском пожалуйста!There have been many
Помогите пожалуйста написать сочинение на британском пожалуйста!
There have been many technological developments in the past yea for example in transport, telecommunications and health.
What technological development do you rhink has been the most important? How has it changed people's lives? Have all the changes been positive?
Write 200-250 words.
Use the following plan:
1)make an introduction (state the problem)
2)express your personal opinion and reasons for it
3) give arguments for the other point of view and explain why you don't agree with it
4)draw a conclusion
Татьяна Граур
Я напишу. Постараюсь попрытче.
Veronika
хорошо, можно и завтра к вечеру
Артём Вардашанский
Превосходно, тогда я поближе к ночи тебе все сделаю.
Ангелина Болотникова
спасибо
Юрик Черей
У вас углубленное исследование?
Аделина Убогова
Нет
Корбух
Вовка
А для какого класса?
Вадим
9 .
Саша
Светло. Просто написано 1-4 класс)
Violetta Sapjanova
не знаю почему, наверняка надобно было что то исправить
1 ответ
Лидия Кабазова
Наноассемблер.
I would like to inform you about a molecular assembler, wich is defined by K. Eric Drexler, is a "proposed device able to guide chemical reactions by positioning reactive molecules with atomic precision".In 2007 the British Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council has started the development of ribosome-like molecular assemblers.Before, the term "molecular assembler" or "nano-assembler" has been used in science fiction and popular culture/ It refers to a wide range of fictional nanomachines, that manipulate with atoms. But they may be physically impossible to be constructed in reality.I think that molecular assembler is the most importaint step of the human culture and civilization. If everyone or every city or town gets such a device, the poverty and hunger will be defited. There will be no corporations, no slavery and the humane society will built.The professor saidBecause the fingers of a manipulator arm must themselves be мейд out of atoms, they have a certain irreducible size. There just isn't enough room in the nanometer-size reaction region to accommodate all the fingers of all the manipulators necessary to have complete control of the chemistry....[Also,] the atoms of the manipulator hands will adhere to the atom that is being moved. So it will often be impossible to release this minuscule building block in precisely the right spot. Both these problems are fundamental, and neither can be avoided. Self-replicating, mechanical nanobots are simply not possible in our world.That means that such a device can not be made in reality because of the compteness of the operation controlling process and impossibility of using so many arms.But I don't agree because we can see a lot of examples of such devices like - spaceships, cell phones, flying cars (e.x. Boeing Vahana) and many others. Now we are using them without even thinking of the previous debates. And I suppose that this problems with be soon solved.
I would like to inform you about a molecular assembler, wich is defined by K. Eric Drexler, is a "proposed device able to guide chemical reactions by positioning reactive molecules with atomic precision".In 2007 the British Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council has started the development of ribosome-like molecular assemblers.Before, the term "molecular assembler" or "nano-assembler" has been used in science fiction and popular culture/ It refers to a wide range of fictional nanomachines, that manipulate with atoms. But they may be physically impossible to be constructed in reality.I think that molecular assembler is the most importaint step of the human culture and civilization. If everyone or every city or town gets such a device, the poverty and hunger will be defited. There will be no corporations, no slavery and the humane society will built.The professor saidBecause the fingers of a manipulator arm must themselves be мейд out of atoms, they have a certain irreducible size. There just isn't enough room in the nanometer-size reaction region to accommodate all the fingers of all the manipulators necessary to have complete control of the chemistry....[Also,] the atoms of the manipulator hands will adhere to the atom that is being moved. So it will often be impossible to release this minuscule building block in precisely the right spot. Both these problems are fundamental, and neither can be avoided. Self-replicating, mechanical nanobots are simply not possible in our world.That means that such a device can not be made in reality because of the compteness of the operation controlling process and impossibility of using so many arms.But I don't agree because we can see a lot of examples of such devices like - spaceships, cell phones, flying cars (e.x. Boeing Vahana) and many others. Now we are using them without even thinking of the previous debates. And I suppose that this problems with be soon solved.
, оставишь ответ?
Похожие вопросы
-
Вопросы ответы
Новое
NEW
Статьи
Информатика
Статьи
Последние вопросы
Игорь 14 лет назад был на 8 лет моложе, чем его
Математика.
Два тела массами m1 и m2 находящие на расстоянии R друг
Физика.
В сосуде 4целых одна пятая литр воды что бы заполнить сосуд
Математика.
Двум малярам Диме И Олегу поручили выкрасить фасад дома они разделили
Разные вопросы.
найти порядковый номер 41Э если в ядре 20 нейтронов
Разные вопросы.
в ряду натуральных чисел 3, 8, 10, 24, … 18 одно
Математика.
Предприятие по производству с/хоз продукции на производство затратило 3527000 руб Валовый
Разные вопросы.
Математика, задано на каникулы. ВАРИАНТ 1004
НОМЕР 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8.
Математика.
Имеются три конденсатора емкостью С1=1мкФ, С2=2мкФ и С3=3мкФ. Какую наименьшую емкость
Физика.
Из точки м выходят 3 луча MP MN и MK причём
Геометрия.
Облако тегов